CSIP Alerts to CSIC revoked members

ALERT to all 764 revoked members at CSIC as former transitional members

CSIP is asking you to send this letter to CSIC legal department immediately to reserve your rights and clean your name from any further defamation to your profession..

Cut and paste the letter written below and use your full name and address on the letter head and send it to CSIC.

Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants390 Bay Street, Suite 1600Munich Re CenterToronto, Ontario Canada M5H 2Y2Via Fax: 416-572-4114or Via Email: information@csic-scci.ca
Dear, CSIC Chair and Board of Directors of CSIC

This is my warning letter to CSIC in respect of gravely defamatory statements published by you and your directors against my name as an immigration consultant, to the public dated November 18th, 2006 at this link
https://www.csic-scci.ca/eIS_Reports/Clients/CSIC/ExtranetWebForms/CSICMembershipList.aspx?lang=E&Rpt=RevokedMemberList
.
The published revoked membership list makes the libellous and false allegations that I as former transitional member have failed the membership exam and I am no longer valid member of good standing which is “threatening and harassing to my profession”, that you have made “unfounded allegations” and generally asserts that I have engaged in unauthorized conduct in respect of representing my clients before the CIC. The obvious message or innuendo to the public in this posting is that I am is irresponsible consultant, dangerous, and unethical and unauthorized and that the Public (prospective CIC clients) should not deal with me to represent them in any form of representation. Quite apart from the legal presumption in the law of defamation that these postings and statement and innuendos are false, I advised you CSIC and the CIC that they are utterly untrue in fact.
By taking the remarkable step of communicating these allegations to the public locally, nationally, and internationally in the midst of representing my clients to the CIC for immigration under presentation for the past five years , you and your Board of Directors have caused me incalculable damage to my profession and my immigration business. I expect you are aware of the financial magnitude of the 764 names on this posting, which could well put ours and our client’s damages from the defamation into the hundred of millions of dollars against your society.
You and your Board of Directors have repeatedly advised us that you were planning to cause damage to me and my other colleagues and our participation in presenting clients without CSIC membership, raising the distinct smell of malice.
The only apparent reason or motive for communicating these outrageous allegations and false advertising to the public can be to destroy our immigration business, our profession and the CIC client’s reputation and take advantage for personal profit of any opening that creates for your new inexperienced members. I understand CSIC is continuing to spread lies about my immigration profession in your communication with CIC and advertise false information connected to my name as former CSIC member on your website.
I demand an immediate retraction by removing my name of the revoked membership list and apology, the terms of which must be approved by me and my other 763 revoked members in advance to avoid making matters worse. The post revoked member list has set in motion a series of communications to the public destroying my reputation, and I expect you and your board of members to act promptly in stopping that process before it becomes worse. Failure to do so will be seen as a conscious decision to allow that defamation to spread and cause further damage to CSIC.
It goes without saying that any repetition or further communication by letter to CIC or advertising using CSIC website, email, personal discussion or otherwise of these or other negative allegations against me or my other 763 colleagues will be regarded as a malicious aggravation of damages.
We 764 revoked members reserve the right to bring this letter to the attention of any court dealing with this matter shortly.

Sincerely yours

____________________________(Write your name)

_________________________________ sign it and send it to CSIC immediately by fax, email, or mail, send a copy to CSIP





















----- Original Message -----
From: <canvisa@bellnet.ca>
To: "Salloum Company" <salloumcompany@shaw.ca>
Cc: <canglobal@hotmail.com>; <roy77@mail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 6:10 AM
Subject: Another Law Suit!

Not another Law suit!!! What gets me is that CSIC does not tell its Full Members how many Law suits the society is facing. I know that CSIC has been involved in the following litigation;1. CSIC fought and got intervener status against IAIP and CIC suit,2. CSIC fought and got intervener status against Chinese Chamber of Commerce and CIC,3. CSIC sued CSIP for an interpretation that someone at CSIC wanted silenced,4. The Law Societies of Canada and the Law Society of Upper Canada is heading to the courts this December 2006 over a lack of Consumer Protection and no fundamental justice over CSIC By-Law 13.Do you know of any more Law Suits? I have given up asking questions of persons at CSIC.Anything we do with our five senses we interpret. I have stated before that it clearly appears that the George W. Bush mentality is running CSIC. I just do not understand why.. How come so many people think that CSIC and its board of directors are in the wrong?. Was Donald Rumsfeld correct when he thought he was winning the war in Iraq?. Which members authorized CSIC to get involved in litigation without being sued themselves?. How can CSIC interpret IP9 that everyone has to be an authorized representative to receive payment for advice when the IRB, CIC and CBSA interpret the same regulations that representation for a fee is allowed as long as the Immigration Consultant gets paid upfront?. Why does CSIC think they can control the actions of former members with the by-laws after CSIC themselves revokes their status?. Showing so many revoked members in the same area of main PUBLIC home page with so few as Intent To Resign Members makes the society open to ridicule by the public, does it not?. Why does CSIC CPD committee ask for persons or organizations to be a provider and then put on the form "PROPOSED FEE"?. Why does CSIC board of directors believe that the pockets of members are so full that they will continue to pay?. Did CSIC not learn anything from the last election in the states or would they like Donald Rumsfeld phone number?. Why are there seven quick links on the CSIC home page regarding Complaints Process and Rules of Professional Conduct and not one item regarding increasing public confidence in services if they are both key principles of CSIC?. How did the board of CSIC amend the requirements to obtain full membership (give me the money) after the transition date without taking the resolution to the full members as per the by-laws?The American Public voted recently and changed the structure of both houses. Will full members do the same? I doubt it!!! I have had three brand new full members of CSIC ask to work with me this week so that they could participate in Appeals, Refugee Hearing, ADR's Detention Reviews etc. None of these full members have ever presented a case nor have they ever submitted a H&C application to CIC yet their full members. None have put together a package of submissions for an appeal or virtually anything else other then getting students abroad which is NOT covered by the regulations.YET there are at least 110 consultants who paid $530.00 to write the tests again.What is an experienced consultant definition according to CSIC board of directors? . Would an Immigration Consultant who has been very successful at hearings and appeals for more then a decade be considered an experienced consultant?. Would an Immigration Consultant who has been very successful at all areas of overseas Immigration including bringing several Investors to Canada in the last decade an experienced consultant?NO!IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE CSIC BOARD OF DIRECTORS INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN MATTERS?YOU DECIDE!

Roy Kellogg